Trust Page
Pricing and Scope for Alberta Small-Business AI Projects
There is no single package that fits every workflow. Pricing follows scope, and scope follows the actual business process, current systems, risk level, and team support required for launch.
Why there is no flat price on the website
Because the main variables are not cosmetic. The estimate changes based on workflow complexity, integrations, knowledge readiness, review rules, training, and how much post-launch refinement your team needs.
What usually keeps first-phase scope sensible
- - One workflow, one owner, and one clear business outcome
- - A current stack that can support the first implementation without a rebuild
- - A narrow first phase focused on intake, booking, follow-up, or knowledge access
What makes scope balloon
- - Trying to automate multiple departments in the first phase
- - No approved content, policy owner, or handoff rules
- - Heavy custom integrations before a practical use case is proven
Workflow diagram
How pricing is normally established
Audit and workflow review
Confirm the live bottleneck, systems, and risk profile before discussing build work.
Written scope and rollout path
Define the first workflow, success criteria, and what is intentionally left out of phase one.
Implementation, training, and review
Estimate build work, team training, and post-launch refinement instead of only software costs.
What this page should clarify
Why a scoped first workflow is usually the smartest budget move
Why software cost is only one part of the real implementation effort
Why rollout support and handoff design matter for small teams
Want the right first move instead of more AI noise?
Start with a free readiness audit. We will tell you what workflow should come first, what should wait, and what would make the rollout safer for your team.